AMD vs Intel: yaƙi na har abada

Intel da AMD manyan kamfanoni ne guda biyu waɗanda kusan sun shiga yaƙi tun lokacin da suke. Bugu da kari, ba wai kawai kamfanonin biyu suna fada da fasahar kere kere ba ne kawai don samun damar tsallake dayan kuma su sami kaso mafi tsoka na kasuwa, amma masu amfani da kansu ne suka inganta da karfafa wannan yakin, suka sanya su a bangarorin biyu bisa ga dangantakar su don daya ko daya.

Saboda haka, AMD vs Intel Abu ne da ya kasance, yake kuma zai kasance a fagen aikin sarrafa kwamfuta na dogon lokaci. Saboda haka, a wannan lokacin mun sadaukar da wannan labarin ga wannan gwagwarmaya kuma mun baku dukkan makullin don ku fahimci labarin da kyau da kuma yadda wannan bayanin zai iya taimaka muku zaɓi mafi kyawun samfura don kayan aikin kwamfutarku daga ra'ayin Linux, tunda yana da ra'ayi wanda ba a magana sosai game da yanar gizo duk da samun tarin labarai akan wannan batun ...

A kadan tarihi

Idan muka koma baya kadan a cikin tarihi, musamman zuwa 1947 lokacin da tarihin transistor na farko ya fara ƙirƙira. Daga can manyan mutane uku suka bayyana, Shockley, Brattain da Bardeen wannan tarihi zai tuna, mutane ukun da suka sami lambar yabo ta Nobel a fannin kimiyyar lissafi saboda binciken da suka yi, wanda shine ya fito da duk wani juyin juya halin fasaha. Amma idan kun san wannan labarin, bai ƙare ba da kyau ga ɗayan waɗannan masu jagoranci: Williams Shockley.

Kodayake duka ukun sun hada kai, amma lauyoyi don Bell LabsDakunan gwaje-gwaje na AT&T inda wannan labarin ya faru sun yanke shawarar kada su hada da Shockley a cikin takardar izinin kirkirar transistor saboda ra'ayin Shockley ya fi wahalar karewa saboda wata takardar izinin mallakar da ta gabata a Turai don sanannen na'urar semiconductor. Lissafin filin sakamako ne wanda Lilienfeld ya gano.

Wannan ya sa Shockley ya tashi cikin fushi kuma ya fara haɓaka aikin da ya ɓoye wa abokan aikinsa, kuma bayan barin Bell ya yi ƙoƙarin gwada sa'arsa a gabar Californian. Amma wannan ya sake bayyana wani labarin daban, na na 1958. A wancan lokacin, Arnold Beckman ya yanke shawarar yin tarayya da Shockley don ƙoƙarin haɓaka ingantaccen na'urar semiconductor ta yin amfani da silico da yin ta kafin TI (Kayan Kayan Texas), wanda a wancan lokacin yake son irinsa.

Rabuwa ya zama sananne ne Shockley Semiconductor, kuma Shockley da kansa ya fara sanya hannu kan abin da ya kira "masu zafi," wato, dukkan ƙwararrun masu hazaka a lokacin, kamar su Victor Grinich, Julius Blank, Jean Hoerni, Jay Last, Eugene Kleiner, Sheldon Roberts, Gordon Moore., Robert Noyce da Jim Gibbons, da sauransu. Amma Shockley mummunan manaja ne kuma mummunan ɗan kasuwa, kuma halayensa masu rikitarwa da fitina ta nuna ƙarfi suna nufin cewa kamfanin ba shi da kyakkyawar makoma ...

Hakan ya sa wayannan baiwa suka bar daya bayan daya, kuma kungiyar ta shirya hanya mafi kyawu Semiconductor mai adalci, kilomita 2 kawai daga masana'antar da ta gabata. A can, yanayin ya fi annashuwa, babu shugaba kuma an ƙarfafa aikin haɗin gwiwa. Ba da daɗewa ba ya zama babban kamfani kuma suka ci gaba da haɓaka manyan baiwa ga ma'aikatansu, ɗayansu shine sabon daraktan tallace-tallace daga 1961, ɗan shekara 24 mai suna Jerry Sanders.

A taron na Sanders tare da Noyce, Sanders zai gamsar da Noyce cewa babu wanda zai sayi transistors na silicon akan $ 150, kuma suna buƙatar siyar dasu ƙasa da $ 2 idan zasu yi nasara. Sannan Noyce ya gaya masa cewa sun san yadda suke, sun san yadda ake miniaturize (1st planar silicon transistor) da ƙananan farashin samarwa don samun damar yin abin da Sanders yayi niyya. Kuma haka aka yi, sannu a hankali sun saukar da farashin su kuma nasarar wannan kamfanin almara ya kasance mai ban mamaki.

Kuma me yasa nake fada muku duk wannan? Yi haƙuri kaɗan, mun kusan isa ɓangaren da yake sha'awar mu. Bayan wannan nasarar, TI's Jack Kilby shima yana haɓaka karko mai ɗorewa, ma'ana, gungun MESA na farko. Kuma a cikin layi daya, Noyce ya jagoranci wani abu makamancin haka a Fairchild, na farko Chipararriyar PLANAR. Falsafan gini biyu daban daban, amma wanda ya shahara a cikin kwakwalwan yau shine na Noyce.

Bayan karya bayanan riba, duk ba labari ne mai kyau ba ga Fairchild, tunda za'a sami sabuwar ƙwaƙwalwar ƙwaƙwalwa, maimaita labarin masu ɓarna 8, ko 'Ya'yan Fairchild kamar yadda ake kiran su yanzu:

• David Talber, Bob Widlar da Charles Sporck sune farkon waɗanda suka bar Fairchild, wanda aka samo Mai bautar kasa.
• Noyce da Moore suma zasu bar shi, kuma tare da Andy Grove zai samu Intel.
• Hoerni zai bar jagorancin Amelco, wanda daga baya zai kasance Fasaha ta Microchip.
• Hakanan za a kori Jerry Sanders, kuma tare da Jack Gifford, Edwin Turney, John Carey, Larry Stenger, Frank Botte, Sven Simonsen da Jim Giles, zai sami haɗin gwiwa AMD.
• David Allison, David James, Lionel Kattner, Mark Wissenstern, da sauransu sun kafa Signetics.
• Robert Schreiner da wasu zasu samu Synertek.
• Federico Faggin, bayan ya ratsa Intel, zai samu zilog.
• Wilfred Corrigan ya kafa LSI Mai hankali.
• Julius Blank zai sami haɗin gwiwa ciko.
• Da dai sauransu.

Wannan shine ma'anar, daga tokar Fairchild ya tashi abin da muka sani a yau Silicon Valley. Kuma da zarar an kafa kwarin Silicon kuma manyan mutane biyu suka fara tafiya, ba komai abu ne mai sauƙi ba duka biyun. Jerry Sanders na AMD koyaushe ya kasance yana faɗin cewa ya ɗauki mintuna miliyan 5 kafin ya sami $ 5 don tallafawa sabon kamfanin (yana nufin mai kuɗin Intel Arthur Rock yana alfahari a lokacin da ya tara dala miliyan 5 don samo Intel a cikin min 5 kawai.

Saboda haka, Intel ya fara aiki mai kyau, yayin da AMD yana ta gwagwarmaya tun ranar 1. Koyaya, AMD koyaushe yana iya haɗuwa da mafi kyawun don iya gasa tare da kasafin kuɗi na bincike ƙasa da na Intel kuma wannan ba ya bayyana sosai a cikin samfuran su, kuma a wasu lokuta, sun ma fi Intel aiki. Wani abu da ke da cancantar x10, dole ne in yarda.

A farkon shekarun, AMD har ma ya zama abokin Intel kuma kera kwakwalwan kamfani a ƙarƙashin lasisi daga IntelHar ma sun sanya hannu kan yarjejeniyar sanya hannu don raba ra'ayoyi. Amma daga baya za su fara ƙirƙirar kwayoyi masu ƙyalli tare da ɗan aiki fiye da na Intel, kuma bayan ƙirƙirar kwayoyi ta hanyar injiniyan baya, sun fara tsara samfuran su daga farko. Sannan kwanciyar hankali ya ba da hadari, da kuma matsanancin gasa don zama mafi kyau ...

Sauran labarin ya ci gaba latent a yau...

AMD vs Intel: daga mahangar CPUs da aikinsu a Linux

Idan mun bi tarihin kamfanonin biyu a hankali, za mu san cewa Intel ta jagoranci hanya don yawancin tarihi. Bayan zamanin mulkin mallaka, mawuyacin lokaci ya zo wa AMD, kuma ba har zuwa zuwan K7 ba, lokacin da godiya ga babban baiwa na injiniyoyin da suka zo daga DEC kuma cewa sunyi aiki a cikin Alpha (microprocessors na lokacin), basu sanya kansu a gaban Intel ba kuma sun karɓi babban kasuwa daga Intel.

Ba wai kawai sun fi kyau ba ne a cikin aiki, amma har ma da fasaha. A zahiri, AMD koyaushe ta san yadda ake tarayya da mafi kyawun, kamar yarjejeniyarsu da IBM wanda ya basu damar zama farkon waɗanda suka fara amfani da fasahar haɗin Intanet ta jan karfe da alminium wanda ya jagoranci su shawo kan matsalar 1Ghz da farko. Bayan saka K7 (Athlon) zuwa matsananci ko aikin rufi tare da Athlon XP, Intel na iya numfasa wani abu mai sauƙi tare da Pentium 4, musamman tare da HT.

Hakanan AMD zai fara kai 64-bit da farko, tare da K8, wanda sakamakon masu kirkirar K7 ne, suka sanya a karo na farko da ISA suka sake tsarawa don tsawaita IA-32 kuma suka ambata a matsayin Saukewa: AMD64 (Kodayake Intel tana son kiranta EM64T don kar ta koma ga kishiyarta). Amma bayan wannan, Intel yana da darasi sosai kuma zai kuma ɗauki injiniyoyi daga rusasshiyar DEC, wanda ya haifar da ginin gine-ginen.

Kuma bayan isowar wannan, AMD hakika ya kasance a bayyane a bayyane, kuma kodayake suna da ƙira sosai tare da Fusion, gaskiyar ita ce ba ta ba da sakamakon da ake tsammani ba. Wannan ya haifar da Intel don dawo da kusan ƙididdigar kwakwalwan kwamfutaKuma siyen AMD na ATI basu taimaka ma tattalin arzikin kamfanin koren tattalin arzikin ba. Bayan waɗannan shekaru masu wahala, AMD ta yi ƙoƙarin dawo da ƙwararrun injiniyoyinta.

Mutanen da suka tafi wasu kamfanoni kamar Apple, don ƙirƙirar A-Series SoCs, da sauransu, kuma sun sami damar dawo da su Jim keller, mai yiwuwa mutumin da ya fi sani game da microprocessors masu aiki sosai, Pappermaster, Koduri, da dai sauransu. Kuma babban kamfanin da yake, ya fara aiki kamar dai kamfani ne sau 10 da ya fi ƙanana girma. Sun watsar da kusan duk ayyukan da suke yi na ci gaba.

Suna kawai son mayar da duk ƙarfin su akan GPUs da CPUs, kuma bayan ƙoƙari na shekaru sun sami damar ɗaukar sakamakon da ake tsammani: Zen. Sabuwar microarchitecture wacce ta shirya baiwa Intel yawan ciwon kai da kuma dawo da tsohuwar daukaka ta zamanin K7, kuma gaskiyar magana itace sun aikata hakan, harma suna samun lambobin yabo da yawa wadanda suka fahimci hakan. AMD yana da ɗan ƙarin asusun lafiya saboda wannan.

Intel ya daɗe yana ba da mahimmancin gaske a kan aiki guda ɗaya a yau, yayin da AMD ya kwashe shekaru yana damuwa da shi. Multi-core yi. Tare da Zen wannan ya canza, kuma sun yi ƙoƙari sosai don haɓaka aikin mahimmin abu kuma. Har ma sun ƙara SMTs kamar Intel, masu tsinkaye masu tsinkaye waɗanda ke amfani da hanyoyin sadarwar wucin gadi, da sauran sabbin abubuwa waɗanda suka sa Ryzen yayi nasara.

Koyaya, duk da ƙoƙari, dole ne a gane cewa Intel tana yin hakan tsawon shekaru, shekarun ci gaba da ɗimbin kuɗi da aka saka a cikin bincike da ci gaba, don haka har yanzu su ne na farko a ciki. Don haka idan kuna neman mafi kyau guda core yi, dole ne ka zabi Intel. Amma idan kuna neman aikin layi daya ko na multicore, AMD ce ke cin nasara, musamman tunda kayan aikinta suna da rahusa sosai kuma suna nuna ƙarin maɗaurai da zare.

Amma don haka ka san abin da ke don mafi kyau a kowane hali:

• Ayyukan Singlecore: ya fi kyau ga wasannin bidiyo da shirye-shirye masu sauƙi kamar aikin kai tsaye na ofis da sauransu waɗanda muke amfani da su yau da kullun.
• Ayyukan multicore: shine mafi kyawun amfani da wasu shirye-shiryen ilimin kimiyya ko ƙarin ƙwararru kamar GIM, Photoshop, Blender, da sauran aiki don ƙira da 3D.

Wannan ba yana nufin cewa AMD yayi mummunan hali tare da wasan bidiyo ko aikin ofis na ofis ba, nesa da shi, ko kuma cewa Intel za ta aikata mummunan hali a cikin wasu. Ina kawai cewa ginshiƙan Intel za su ɗan yi kyau a farkon, kuma AMD na biyu. Kuma game da farashin, a mafi yawan lokuta, yana mafi riba don saya AMD fiye da Intel, ban da wannan kuma suna da ɗan dawwama dangane da rayuwa mai amfani kafin su gaza.

Misali, idan kuna shirin saka € 500, zaku iya sayan microprocessor AMD mafi kyawu akan wannan farashin fiye da idan zaku je zangon da Intel ke bayarwa, tunda yana da ɗan tsada. AMD ya sami damar bugawa da ƙarfi idan ya zo ga yin aiki tare da Zen, amma kuma suna sauke farashin da yawa don cutar da Intel har ma da ƙari. Kuma kamar wannan bai isa ba, matsalolin da Intel ke fuskanta na rage 10nm a masana'anta suna ba AMD damar da tuni ya sanar da kwakwalwan kwamfuta 7nm, tare da gasa a cikin kasuwar da wannan ke bayarwa ...

Idan kayi mamakin idan ɗayan ko ɗayan suna da mafi kyau ko mafi munin aiki akan Linux, gaskiyar ita ce duka suna bayar da mafi kyawun fasali, kuma haɓakawa kan gine-ginen kernel suna da kyau "sun ɓata" don haka aikin da aka bayar shine mafi kyau. Dukansu suna da ƙungiyoyin masu haɓakawa waɗanda ke haɗin kan kernel na Linux.

Wani tambaya zai zama jigogi na tsaro, ta yaya ka sani, Meltdown da Specter (da sababbin abubuwan ban sha'awa), Ya fi shafar Intel, kuma faci don daidaita raunin haɓaka rage aiki a wani ɓangare ...

Kuma a ƙarshe, ƙara cewa dangane da mai amfanin da kake, zaka buƙaci a gama ko wasu:

• Userananan mai amfaniIdan kana son kayan aiki na aikin ofis, imel, da kuma yawo a yanar gizo, tare da Core i3 ko Ryzen 3 zaka sami wadatar su. Hakanan zasu cancanci yawancin APUs na AMD. Ba na ba da shawarar samun Intel Atom, Intel Celeron ko Intel Pentium, tunda suna da mummunan aiki a farkon lamarin, kuma a cikin biyun da suka gabata suna da wasu halaye ...
  • Shawarwarin LxA: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G 3.5Ghz don farashinsa na tattalin arziƙi da cikakken tallafi tare da ƙwarewar fasaha, haɓaka kari, da dai sauransu.
• Matsakaicin mai amfani: Ga yawancin masu amfani waɗanda suke yin komai kaɗan, daga aikin sarrafa kai na ofishi, zuwa na watsa labarai ko wasannin bidiyo, tare da Ryzen 5 ko Core i5 za ku iya samun wadatar su, matuƙar wasannin bidiyo ba su da ƙarfi sosai.
  • Shawarwarin LxA: Intel Core i5-8600K ko Ryzen 5 2600X, ƙulla fasaha. Dangane da aikin gaba ɗaya, basu da nisa, kodayake kamar yadda muka fada, Intel tana samun nasara a cikin guda ɗaya, amma gaskiya ne cewa zaka iya ajiye kusan € 70 tare da AMD.
• Mai sana'a / GamerIdan kai gwani ne kuma kana son yin aiki kaɗan ko ka ɗauki kanka ɗan wasa, to sai ka tafi Core i7 ko Ryzen 7 ba tare da jinkiri ba.
  • Shawarwarin LxA: A wannan yanayin, don yan wasa sun fi Intel Core i7-9800X kyau, kuma idan kuna amfani dashi don wasu ƙwararrun masu amfani muna ba da shawarar AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, wanda ke biyan rabin kuma yana da kashi 10% kaɗan a wasu lokuta ...
• Mai kwazo: Idan baku damu da kuɗi ba, kuma kuna son wani abu wanda ya wuce duk abubuwan da ke sama, to yana iya zama zaɓi mai kyau don mallakar Ryzen Threadripper ko Core i9, kodayake waɗannan ana ɗaukar su a matsayin zaɓi mai kyau ga ƙaramin rukuni na masu amfani, kamar wasu ƙwararrun masu ƙira ko magoya baya waɗanda ke neman mafi kyawun mafi kyau ... Duk da haka, na ɗauka mafi wayo ne don siyan Core i7 ko Ryzen 7 kuma sabunta shi da zarar sabon abu ya fito, fiye da kashe kuɗi adadi mai yawa akan Ryzen Threadripper ko Core i9.
  • Shawarwarin LxA: Ko dai ɗayan, dukansu suna da tsada kuma dukansu dabbobi ne masu sarrafawa… Idan kayi jinkiri tsakanin samfura, muna bada shawarar Intel Core i9-9960X da AMD Threadripper 2990WX. Don farashin irin wannan kuna da kwatankwacin 16 da 32 a lokaci guda daga Intel, idan aka kwatanta da maɗaura 32 da zaren 64 daga AMD.

Ka tuna abu ɗaya, lambobi na farko da na biyu a cikin jeren sun fi komai mahimmanci. Wato, yana halarta ga tsarin mulki don haka ba su ba ku kurege ba:

• Modelungiyar Samfurin Samfuran XZZZY: idan kun duba lambar, zaka iya ganin abubuwa kamar AMD Ryzen i5-2700X ko Intel Core i7-8700K. Kun riga kun san cewa rukunin i3, i5 i7, i9 ko 3, 5, 7, Threadripper yana nufin ƙungiyar masu amfani da suke niyya. Mafi girman shi, ƙimar aiki da tsada zai kasance. Lambar ta gaba, kamar su 2 dangane da misalin AMD da na sanya ko 8 a cikin na Intel, wani ma shine mafi mahimmanci. Yana nufin tsara, ƙarni mafi girma yana nufin microarchitecture tare da ƙarin aiki. Kar wasu dabi'u su jagorance ka. Misali, Core i7-4000 zaiyi aiki da Core i7-9000 koda kuwa tsohon yayi girma. Sauran lambobin, abin da na sanya azaman ZZZ suna nufin wasu fa'idodi kamar adadin ƙwayoyin cuta, mitar, da dai sauransu, don haka mafi girma zai nuna cewa ya fi ƙarfi. A ƙarshe, Y shine harafin ƙarshe, K ko X galibi suna nuna maɗaukakiyar mitoci ko buɗe don overclocking, yayin da wasu haruffa kamar G yawanci suke rarrabe waɗanda suke da hadadden GPU, da U don masu ƙananan ƙarfi don littattafan rubutu.

Ina tsammanin da wannan kuna da kyakkyawar ma'anar abin da kuke buƙata ...

AMD vs Intel: daga ra'ayin GPUs da aikinsu a cikin Linux

Dangane da GPUs, abubuwa suna canzawa sosai, ta wannan fuskar, bayan sayan ATI ta AMD, an bar su da mai zane na GPU na biyu bayan NVIDIA. Yunkurin ya kwance damarar Intel, wanda ba a ba shi izinin mallakar NVIDIA ba, don haka aka kebe su. GPUs AMD sun yi rawar gani, da kyau a saman Intel GPUs. Hadadden Intel HD ko Intel UHD graphics sun bar abubuwa da yawa da ake so kuma basu wadatar ga yawancin masu amfani ba.

Sabanin haka, koda AMD APUs suna da kyawawan hotuna masu kyau. Yanzu, idan kuna neman GPU mafi ƙarfi don ƙirar zane ko wasa, to yakamata ku sayi ɗaya GPU da aka keɓe daga AMD ko NVIDIA. Daga qarshe, anan yakin AMD da Intel ya haifar da gagarumar nasara ga AMD.

• Shawarwarin LxA: Koyaushe zaɓi AMD ko NVIDIA, amma idan kai mai amfani ne na Linux, to kada ku yi shakka: KO DA yaushe AMD. Ko dai an haɗa shi a cikin APU ko sadaukarwa, amma AMD zai ba ku ƙwarewar Linux mafi kyau, aiki mafi kyau tare da kowane direba kuma zai ba ku ƙananan matsaloli, yana mai da komai sauƙi ...
  • Ga masu amfani da ƙananan aiki: kowane ɗayan waɗanda aka gina su A-Series ko Ryzen G-Series APUs.
  • Ga masu amfani da matsakaici: AMD Radeon RX 500 Jerin
  • Don masu amfani ko masu wasa: AMD Radeon Vega Jerin
  • Masana da masu zane: AMD Radeon Pro WX Jerin

Da yawa sosai, cewa Intel ta ƙaddamar da wasu ƙananan kwamfutar tafi-da-gidanka kamar wanda kuke gani a hoton da ke sama, an yi masa alama da G a ƙarshen jerin kuma haɗawa da AMD GPU da Intel CPUIna nufin, suna da mafi kyawun duniyan biyu. Mafi kyawun CPU tare da GPU mafi kyawu don yin gasa tare da NVIDIA a cikin ɓangaren na'urar da za a iya ɗauka. Haka ne, kun karanta daidai, bayan shekaru na gwagwarmaya, dukansu sun sake sanya hannu kan "zaman lafiya" don wannan haɗin gwiwar ...

Daga ra'ayi na direban Linux, kun riga kun san cewa akwai direbobi na mallaka, waɗanda a kowane yanayi suna ba da aikin da duk abubuwan da ke akwai. Duk da yake game da na 'yanci, abubuwa suna ɗan canzawa, tunda galibi ba a inganta su sosai kuma aikin ba zai yi kyau ba. Koyaya, dole ne in faɗi cewa Intel tana aiki sosai a kwanan nan akan wannan yanayin, kuma AMD tuni ya sanya batura a wurin na dogon lokaci tare da sakamako kamar AMDGPU, misali.

Shekarun da suka wuce, ATI katunan zane-zane basu da komai Taimakon LinuxIdan kuna son kyakkyawan sakamako, kusan an tilasta muku ku zaɓi NVIDIA don Linux, amma a kwanan nan ga alama tebura sun juye da juzu'i da yawa, sakamakon NVIDIA ya bar abin da yawa da ake so. Kuma wannan shine abin da sashe mai zuwa game da ...

AMD vs Intel: daga ra'ayi na tallafi na Linux

Kamar yadda na ce, akwai samari daga AMD da Intel sun shiga cikin ci gaban kernel na Linux don haka ana iya tallafawa microprocessors yadda yakamata. Sabili da haka, a kowane yanayi yana da kyau kwarai, kodayake facin yanayin rashin lafiyar da aka ambata a sama yana da “ɓarke” ingantawar. A cikin ɓangaren zane-zane, AMD ta fi mai da hankali kan haɗa GPU ɗinta fiye da yadda Intel take.

Amma 'yan makonnin da suka gabata, Intel yana son ƙara ɗan shiga cikin kuma inganta direbobin ku don zane-zane. Amma ba shi da mahimmanci sosai, tunda Intel GPUs ba su da kima sosai kuma ba da gaske nake ba da shawarar ba. Sabili da haka, wanene ya damu da samun kyakkyawan goyan baya ga Intel GPU idan a matakin kayan aikin bai auna ba.

• AMD tallafi: Yana da cikakken goyan baya kwanan nan, duka tare da AMDGPU Pro, mallakinta, kuma a cikin AMDGPU na kyauta. Sabili da haka, zaku sami sakamako mafi kyau akan Linux. A zahiri, da alama AMD ta buɗe hanyar buɗewa azaman abubuwan da aka fi so don Linux, kuma suna yin kyau kamar mallakar mallaka ko ma sun ɗan fi kyau a wasu yanayi. Ee, kun karanta wannan dama, akasin NVIDIA. Hakanan, idan kun shirya amfani NVIDIA Optimus o AMD Switchable GraphicsDole ne in faɗi cewa game da Windows NVIDIA da AMD suna aiki lafiya, amma a cikin Linux zaku sami sauƙi tare da AMD.
• Intel goyon baya: Ba su kasance mafi kyau a wannan ba, saboda ba kasuwa ba ce suke mamaye ko dai. Amma kwanan nan kamar yadda na fada sun dan yi karamin tunani game da GPUs na kwarai.
• NVIDIA tallafi: idan zamuyi magana game da sabon salon, to buɗe matukansa sunfi waɗanda suke mallakar yawa. A zahiri, wasu gwaje-gwaje suna nuna sakamako ga masu mallakar wanda ya ninka har sau 9 sama da buɗewa ... Wani abu mara kusan uzuri.

Ina fatan kuna son wannan gudummawar tawali'u ga LxA, kuma bayan wannan, zaku iya yanke shawara mafi kyau lokacin siyan kayan aiki don distro da kuka fi so ... Kar ku manta da barin ku comentarios.