Kuyahlekisa ukuthi inkululeko ingaba kanjani ngumqondo onzima futhi ohumusheke kangaka. Ubufakazi balokhu ngamalayisense esoftware, kunenqwaba yawo, futhi uma siya emkhakheni weFree Software sithola amabili ahumusha inkululeko emibonweni ephikisana ngokuphelele.
BSD y I-LPG, bobabili kwesinye isikhathi babekela imingcele inkululeko ethile, ake sibone.
Ilayisense I-GPL, Ilayisensi Yomphakathi Jikelele ivumela abasebenzisi ukuthi basebenzise ngokukhululeka ikhodi yohlelo inqobo nje uma behlonipha ubuqambi bokuqala futhi babuye bakhiphe ikhodi enelayisense efanayo.
Lokhu kusho ukuthi uma wenza uhlelo lwe-X futhi olunye ufuna ukulusebenzisa, kufanele ushicilele umphumela womsebenzi wakho ngaphansi kwezimo ezifanayo nezelayisense yasekuqaleni, uma ufuna ukwenza isoftware yokuphathelene awukwazi futhi uma ufuna ukudala isoftware yamahhala kodwa ngenye ilayisense noma.
Ekugcineni, lokho umthuthukisi akufinyelela ukukubeka ukusetshenziswa komsebenzi wakhe ngemigomo efanayo lapho aqala khona ukwakhiwa kwesoftware yakhe, kufakwe okungeziwe, kuzohlala kukhululekile futhi kuzohlala kuyi-GPL, yize lokhu kungadala inkinga .
Ngakolunye uhlangothi i Ilayisense ye-BSD. Kuyilayisense yokuthi kubahlambalazi bayo cishe ilayisensi ye-libertine software, kunokuba ibe mahhala. Uma wenza uhlelo olufanayo lwe-X futhi omunye umuntu efuna ukulusebenzisa, ngokwesibonelo, iMicrosoft ethande ukuthi ikhodi yakho isebenza kanjani, izokwazi ukuyithatha ngokukhululeka, ihlonipha kuphela ubunikazi bakho kodwa ingakhiphi izinguquko ezizenzile.
Okutholwa ngunjiniyela ukuthi ikhodi yakhe isebenza noma iyiphi injongo futhi, umthombo ovulekile noma cha, umakhi olandelayo angazikhethela ngokukhululekile ukuthi enzeni ngomsebenzi wakhe.
Sibhekene nemiqondo emibili yenkululeko:
Lowo one-GPL: Inkululeko yokwabelana.
Lowo one-BSD: Inkululeko yokusabalalisa.
Lokhu kufana nomgodi onganamkhawulo kanye nengqungquthela ebekiwe uma kuqhathaniswa, kuzobe kunguwe osho ukuthi iluphi ulasha nokuthi iyiphi ingqungquthela.
Ngabe i-GPL yinhle noma ngabe inciphisa inkululeko kanjiniyela yokusabalalisa?
Ngabe i-BSD ilungile noma ngabe ifaka engcupheni ukuthuthukiswa kwesoftware yamahhala?
Ingabe kukhona enikugcinayo? Qinisekisa impendulo yakho.
Ngivikela i-GPL eyengeziwe ikakhulu ngenxa yesibonelo esihle osibekile. Angifuni inkampani eyenza amakhulukhulu ezinkulungwane zamadola ngomzuzwana ukuthi isebenzise umnikelo wami wamahhala nongenzi nzuzo ukuzizuzisa. Uma bengifuna ukuthi ikhodi yami ibe nenzuzo ngangiyinika ilayisense yokuphathelene.
Lapho umakhi enza ikhodi yamahhala, wenza lokho ukuze kuzuze umphakathi, hhayi izinkampani ezinkulu ezifuna ukushabalalisa isoftware yamahhala.
Ngithe.
Isihloko esibucayi ...
Futhi inkinga enkulu. I-GPL ibonakala iqine kakhulu kimi, kepha angithandi ukuthi abantu basebenzise umsebenzi wami noma ... kahle, kunamalayisense amaningi, kuyindaba yokuwafunda wonke ngokuningiliziwe (ngiyivila, ngiyazi).
Nginombono wokuthi lapho okuthile kukhathalogi, kuqanjwa igama, kuhlotshaniswa, njll ... sekuvele kulahlekelwe yinkululeko.
Zonke izinhlobo zesoftware yamahhala zivumelekile, futhi sonke sikhululekile ukukhetha lokho esikuthandayo nesikuthandayo nganoma yisiphi isikhathi. Sikhululekile ukunquma: leyo yinto yangempela.
Sawubona !!! ... Ngicabanga ukuthi i-GPL ilungile, ngoba lowo umqondo we-Free Software, ukuthi sonke sihlanganyele ekuzuzaneni, kepha nge-BSD elahlekile, ngoba inenketho yokuvala ukuthuthuka kwayo, ngisebenzise ngokunenzuzo umsebenzi wabanye abaningi. ngakolunye uhlangothi, nge-GPL kuqinisekiswa ukuthi ukusebenzisana kuzohlala kukhona.
Ukubingelela
Kimi akukho ukungabaza okuningi, ngibona i-bsd njengomdlavuza we-SL Wenza uhlelo, omunye aluthathe aluphendule lube ngumnikazi (CEDEGA newayini, ngaphandle kokuya kude kakhulu ...) nangekhodi evaliwe, isivele ikwenza okudlula emaqandeni.
Angicabangi.
Ngeshwa, i-SL isadinga ukuvikelwa ezinkampanini nakwamanye amanqe. Kuze kube kunjalo, i-GPL izobe iswele.
Phendula ngokucaphuna
Angihambisani nesitatimende semithombo
"Ngabe i-GPL yinhle noma ngabe inciphisa inkululeko kanjiniyela yokusabalalisa?"
Umthuthukisi unenkululeko enkulu yokusabalalisa ikhodi ayitholile, futhi umkhawulo kuphela ukuthi lapho eyisabalalisa, kufanele akwenze ngaphansi kwezimo ezifanayo nezamukelwe.
I-GPL iyilayisense efanelekile, uma umuntu esewenzile vele lo msebenzi futhi efuna ukuwunikela emhlabeni, uwenza ngeGPL, ukuze noma ngubani azuze emnikelweni wakhe. Kungaba yinto engenabulungiswa ngomuntu oyedwa noma iqembu labantu ukuthi lithathe lelo lifa ELIVAMILE lobuntu (yebo, kunjalo, kunjalo, noma liqhakazile futhi lizwakala kanjani) futhi likusebenzisele ukuzizuzisa noma ukukhawulela amalungelo abo bonke abanye abantu.
Ngendlela efanayo nentuthuko esekwe kukhodi ye-GPL, uma sengivele ngenze ingxenye yomsebenzi, futhi ngikunikeza yona, akulungile ukuthi ngokushintsha umbala wewindi usuvele ucabanga ukuthi ikhodi ingeyakho futhi ungayivala noma uyishintshe ilayisense ... noma ngabe wenze umsebenzi ongu-90% futhi wasebenzisa owami kuphela njenge-plug-in, ngaphandle kwaleyo-plug-in encane, encane, futhi "engabalulekile", ikhodi yakho ibingeke ngibe ngiphelele futhi kufanele nje ukuthi ngifanele ukudunyiswa.ngomsebenzi wami futhi kufanele ukuthi abanye abantu bangazuza kukhodi yami yokubhala engiyinikezayo, kanye nemisebenzi etholakala kuleyo khodi.
Kulabo abangayithandi ilayisense ye-GPL, akuphoqelekile ukuyisebenzisa, kepha uma befuna ukonga inkinga yentuthuko, okuncane kakhulu abangakwenza ukuhlonipha amalungelo wabathuthukisi bangaphambilini kanye nabasebenzisi. Leyo kuphela intengo okufanele uyikhokhe, futhi ngicabanga ukuthi kungakufanele.
Uxolo ukuthumela kabili, kepha ngiyabona ukuthi ngisebenzisa igama elingalungile, futhi kulungile ukuthi ngikulungise: p
Abathuthukisi bokuqala "abayiniki" ikhodi yabo, bagunyaza ukusetshenziswa kwayo nokusatshalaliswa kwayo, kanye nelungelo lokuyiguqula, kepha ekugcineni kosuku, leyo kuseyikhodi YAKHO.
Angithandi noyedwa wabo. Ilayisensi engizoyisebenzisa kuzoba ngeyokuphoqa unjiniyela ukuthi akhiphe izinhlanganisela azenzile ohlelweni lwami, hhayi i-TOOODO ikhodi yakhe. Kuyakhathaza ukubona okuthile kuhlelo ongathanda ukuba nalo olwakho, kepha awukwazi ukubona ikhodi yalo. Ngendlela efanayo, kuyakhathaza ukubona ikhodi yento ongathanda ukuba nayo kuhlelo lwakho, kepha ongakwazi ukuyisebenzisa..
[ugaxekile] Ngibhale i-athikili ngalokhu kubhulogi lami: http://aprendiendolinux.wordpress.com/la-gnu-gpl-%C2%BFuna-licencia-libre%C2%BF/ [/ ugaxekile]
Kokubili kuyadingeka. Futhi ezinye ezithuthukiswa ngokuzayo nazo zizobaluleka. Ifomula elilodwa alikwazi ukumboza zonke izidingo zobuciko (ezenhlalo nezentengiso).
Inkululeko yokuqala ukukwazi ukukhetha phakathi kwamalayisense amaningi atholakalayo futhi ungabophezelekile kwelilodwa kuphela.
Umbono wami usuvele unikezwe nguMcLarenX, futhi okuthile ebengifuna ukukugqamisa sekuvele kwenziwe kahle kakhulu yi-kernel_panic.
Ngithanda ukuma ngale bhulogi ngezikhathi ezithile. Sanibonani!
IsiJalimane.
okwenzekayo ukuthi, njengoba uSocrates esho, umuntu muhle ngokwemvelo ... XD
Engikushoyo ukuthi ubungxiwankulu basungulelwa ukudala ukulingana, futhi banciphisa ukwehlukana kwezenhlalo, ubandlululo njll.
ngendlela efanayo, amalayisense asungulwa ngenhloso enhle ... kepha ngokuhamba kwesikhathi ayonakaliswa, konke njengamanje kuyonakalisa ...
Ngokwami ngikholelwa kakhulu ku-GPL (izizathu, zona lezo ezibhalwe yi-kernel_panic)
okushiwo yinitsuga kuyinto ekhona kwabanye abantu abaningi, kepha ngicabanga ukuthi ibingaxazululwa kuphela uma sonke besingumphakathi, into ekhuthazwa yi-gpl no-stallman (umphakathi awusona isiphithiphithi, iphrojekthi ye-debian ingumphakathi)
@nitsuga: kanti lokho akukho?
Izinto ezimbili:
Okokuqala: @Nitsuga angikuzwisisi.
Okwesibili: Kubiza malini ukwenza ilayisense ekuvumela ukuthi ukhiphe ikhodi njenge-software yamahhala kepha ngaphandle kokusebenzisa leyo layisense?
IMicrosoft ithuthukise iWindows ngenxa yelayisense le-BSD, ngakho-ke ngithanda iGPL.
Hhayi isihogo engingafuna ukuthi inkampani yesoftware engasebenzisi mahhala isebenzise umsebenzi wami.
Inqobo nje uma kunezinkampani zesoftware ezingahambisani nenhle, okuhle yi-GPL, yize okuhle kungaba ilayisense yohlobo lwe-BSD enesigatshana esikhethekile isibopho somsebenzisi wekhodi ukukhipha ukuthuthuka okwenzayo, ngaphandle ukukwenza ngakho konke okunye okwenzayo, okufana nalokho okushiwo nguNitsuga, futhi ngaphandle kwesidingo se-GPL sokukhulula konke ngaphansi kwale layisensi efanayo (okubonakala kimi kuyiphutha elikhulu kunawo wonke kule layisensi eshiwo, kanye nokunye okuhle )
Bengingawazi umehluko phakathi kwamalayisense womabili, kepha ngesibonelo esicacile osinikezile, ngiwaqonde kahle; Futhi ngicabanga njengabaningi, ngicabanga ukuthi i-GPL ingcono, ngoba iphoqa umqambi wohlelo omusha ukuthi akhiphe ikhodi yakhe ngaphansi kwemigomo efanayo neyakho, lokhu kubonakala kukuhle kimi, angifuni ukuthi umuntu acebe ngento engiyenzele yona mahhala futhi ushiye mahhala kuwo wonke umuntu.
P.S. Ngibuya esibhicongweni sesikole !! : D
@sibusisiwe
Ngicabanga ukuthi i-LGPL iyakuvumela lokho
Umehluko omkhulu phakathi kwe-GPL ne-LGPL ukuthi owokugcina angaxhunyaniswa (uma kwenzeka umtapo wezincwadi, 'usetshenziswe') uhlelo olungelona olwe-GPL, olungaba isoftware yamahhala noma isoftware engakhokhelwa. [1 ] Mayelana nalokhu, inguqulo 3 ye-GNU LGPL yethulwa njengeqoqo lezimvume ezingezwe kwi-GNU GPL.
Lezi zinhlelo ezingezona eze-GPL noma ezingezona eze-LGPL zingasatshalaliswa ngaphansi kwanoma iziphi izimo ezikhethiwe uma kungeyona imisebenzi ethathwe kokunye. Uma kungumsebenzi ovela kokunye imigomo kufanele ivumele ukuguqulwa ngumsebenzisi ukuze isetshenziselwe yena nokusetshenziswa kwezindlela zobunjiniyela eziguqukayo zokuthuthukisa ukuguqulwa okushilo. Ukuchaza ukuthi ngabe umsebenzi osebenzisa uhlelo lwe-LGPL ngumsebenzi osuselwe kokunye noma cha kuyindaba esemthethweni (bheka umbhalo we-LGPL). I-standalone esetshenziswayo exhumanisa ngamandla nelabhulali yamukelwa njengomsebenzi ongatholakali kumtapo wezincwadi. Kungathathwa njengomsebenzi umtapo wolwazi owusebenzisayo kanye nendima yesi-5 ye-LGPL ezosebenza.
Uhlelo olungenakho okuvela kunoma iyiphi ingxenye yeLabhulali, kodwa eyenzelwe ukusebenza neLabhulali ngokuhlanganiswa noma ngokuxhunyaniswa nayo, ibizwa ngokuthi «umsebenzi osebenzisa Umtapo Wezincwadi». Umsebenzi onjalo, uwedwa, akuwona umsebenzi ovela kuLabhulali, ngakho-ke awusebenzi ngaphandle kwale Layisense.
Kusuka ekuhumusheni okungekho emthethweni kweSpanish:
Uhlelo olungenawo okuphuma kunoma iyiphi ingxenye yomtapo wolwazi, kodwa olwenzelwe ukusebenza nomtapo wolwazi ngokuhlanganiswa noma ngokuxhunywa kulo, lubizwa ngokuthi "umsebenzi osebenzisa umtapo wolwazi." Umsebenzi onjalo, ngokwehlukana, akuwona umsebenzi osuselwa kumtapo wezincwadi, ngakho-ke awusebenzi ngaphandle kwale ndawo yelayisensi.
Ngokuyinhloko kufanele ukuthi isoftware ixhunyaniswe nenguqulo entsha yohlelo embozwe yi-LGPL. Indlela esetshenziswa kakhulu ukufeza lokhu ukusebenzisa indlela efanelekile yomtapo wolwazi eyabiwe noma enamandla. Ngenye indlela, kuvunyelwe ukuxhumanisa ngokomtapo wezincwadi we-LGPL (bona w: umtapo wezincwadi oxhumene ngokwezibalo) uma ikhodi yomthombo yohlelo inikezwe noma ikhodi yento inikezwe ukuxhumanisa nelabhulali ye-LGPL.
Isici se-LGPL ukuthi noma iyiphi ikhodi ye-LGPL ingaguqulwa ibe yikhodi ye-GPL (isigaba 3 selayisense). Lesi sici siwusizo ekusetshenzisweni okuqondile kwekhodi ye-LGPL kwikhodi ye-GPL yemitapo yolwazi nezinhlelo zokusebenza, noma uma ufuna ukudala inguqulo yekhodi engeke isetshenziswe kusoftware ephathelene.
Kodwa-ke lokho kungaba ubuthakathaka, esikhathini esithile esedlule ngifunde i-athikili kaBruce Perens ngengozi ye-Apache ngoba ayinamalayisense ngaphansi kwemodi ye-GPL, uma isetshenziswa ezinye izintshisekelo (bona iMicrosoft: p)
Ilayisense ye-apache ithi:
Njenganoma iyiphi enye ilayisensi ye-software yamahhala, i-Apache License ivumela umsebenzisi wesoftware inkululeko yokuyisebenzisela noma iyiphi injongo, ayisabalalise, ayishintshe, futhi asabalalise izinhlobo zaleyo software.
Ilayisense ye-Apache ayidingi ukuthi imisebenzi esuselwe kokunye (izinhlobo eziguquliwe) zesoftware isatshalaliswe kusetshenziswa ilayisense efanayo, noma nokuthi kufanele isatshalaliswe njengesoftware yamahhala / evulekile yomthombo. Ilayisense ye-Apache idinga kuphela ukuthi kugcinwe isaziso sokwazisa abamukeli ukuthi ikhodi enelayisense le-Apache isetshenzisiwe ekusabalaliseni. Ngakho-ke, ngokungafani namalayisense we-copyleft, labo abathola izinhlobo eziguquliwe zekhodi enelayisense ye-Apache abazitholi izincwadi ezifanayo. Noma, uma ubheka lesi simo ngombono wabanamalayisense wekhodi ye-Apache, banikezwa "inkululeko" yokusebenzisa ikhodi nganoma iyiphi indlela abayithandayo, kufaka phakathi ukusetshenziswa kwayo kwimikhiqizo yomthombo evaliwe (cf Isigaba 4).
Ikakhulu, ngiphinda isikhundla sami: p, kuzoba nemingcele, kepha akungabazeki ukuthi i-GPL iyilayisense ehamba phambili yesoftware yamahhala: p
Ngizonamathela kwi-GPL, kepha… .. izwe lapho kwakukhona kuphela i-GPL, kungaba umhlaba okhululekile?
@fsources +1
umhlaba lapho kwakukhona kuphela i-GPL, kungaba umhlaba okhululekile?
YEBO, kungaba umhlaba okhululekile.
Kungaba ngumhlaba okhululeke kakhulu ongaba khona.
Umhlaba lapho ulwazi lomuntu ngamunye, oluyigugu lesintu, lubuyiselwa kulo, ngaphandle kwezibopho zezezimali.
Yimodeli yakudala yesintu futhi eyasetshenziswa isikhathi eside kakhulu. Eqinisweni, yilokho okukhuthaze ubuntu: Umnotho wokusabalalisa - kamuva Umnotho owabiwa kabusha-
YEBO, kungaba umhlaba okhululekile.
Kungaba ngumhlaba okhululeke kakhulu ongaba khona.
UKUBA MAHHALA ukwazi ukukhetha. Ngiyayithanda iLinux, ifilosofi ye-GNU kanye nelayisense ye-GPL, kepha uma ngelinye ilanga bezokwenza kube nzima kimi ukufaka isiphequluli se-Opera kuLinux, bethi akuyona isoftware yamahhala, ngalolo suku ngayeka ukusebenzisa iLinux.
"IGPL ivimbela inkululeko ekunciphiseni inkululeko." Kubukeka kuyindida kepha kuyincazelo enhle futhi kungaphansi kwelayisense ye-GPL :)
Ngincike kwilayisense le-GPL ngoba linomthetho jikelele wokwabelana ngolwazi ngaphandle kokuziba… .kuyiparadayim yekusasa. Ngiyabonga.
Uma ikubekela imibandela, ayikhululekile.