With the arrival of GPT-4o, "ChatGPT" has become "ShortInfoGPT". The problem of limitations along with not being able to choose another model

ChatGPT asking for subscription to the Plus version

Before the presentation of GPT-4o, the CEO of OpenAI published a post in X with only 3 letters: Her. When the presentation had already taken place we understood what he meant: his popular Chat GPT She was capable of maintaining fluid conversations like Samantha in the film starring Joaquin Phoenix and Scarlett Johannson. Leaving fear aside, many of us thought that she was doing very well and that we would soon be able to talk like in that feature film, but it turns out that we won't. At least if you don't pay the subscription.

The worst of all this is not that. Furthermore, it is logical that such a powerful tool can only be used if it is paid for. The bad thing is that ChatGPT, that chatbot with whom we could have relatively long conversations, no longer exists. Currently we can only use ChatGPT with the GPT-4o model, and with very few messages if we don't pay. After several queries, the model will revert to the previous GPT3.5, which can be a problem.

What's wrong with the new ChatGPT

The problem is clear: you start a chat, and how they don't let you choose GPT3.5, opens with GPT-4o. After a few messages, the chat prevents you from continuing, it recommends you open a new one and, now, with GTP3.5. The intentions are also clear: create a need for us and make us pay to eliminate the limits.

If they thought more about people, they would do something very simple: allow us to use GPT3.5 to make queries that will require more interactions and GPT-4o when we would like, for example, the answers to be up to date. The newest model can be searched on the Internet, and I have come across some incorrect answers because they are not up to date. I have told him that he was wrong and to search the Internet, he has done so and has already offered the correct answer.

But of course, companies are created to make money. At least the majority.

The problem of not being able to choose

Not being able to choose causes us to waste GPT-4o when it is not necessary. Therefore, here is a recommendation that OpenAI will not like: use ChatGPT less in its official version and more in alternatives as DuckDuckGo AI Chat. What the duck company offers is GPT3.5 without registration, and although it also has limits, by using it we will not waste any of GPT-4o.

In addition to no registration required It also allows you to jump over limits more easily. The problem of a conversation being cut off will also be there, but if we do not need the conversation to follow a thread, we can delete the cookie from the developer tools or open another chat in an incognito window and we can continue using it.

In any case, ChatGPT is no longer a chat if you don't pay. It's a bit like Microsoft Copilot and is worth keeping in mind. That and the alternatives availables.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

*

*

  1. Responsible for the data: AB Internet Networks 2008 SL
  2. Purpose of the data: Control SPAM, comment management.
  3. Legitimation: Your consent
  4. Communication of the data: The data will not be communicated to third parties except by legal obligation.
  5. Data storage: Database hosted by Occentus Networks (EU)
  6. Rights: At any time you can limit, recover and delete your information.